McCarson v. Bullock
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
The McCarson appellants and appellees jointly owned the 80 acres of potential sulphur land here involved; on March 17, 1928, there were among them three contractual instruments executed to the appellant sulphur company, which are fully described in the trial court’s findings herein; upon these three instruments — together with an additional one of August 6, 1930, executed by Booth McCar-son alone to the sulphur company and affecting the same property — this suit was based, wherein the appellee McCarson sought of and obtained judgment therefor against all the appellants…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
- Briscoe v. BronaughTexas Supreme Court · 1846
- Faville v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Clark v. HaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Hooser v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- CVN Group, Inc. v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- CVN Group, Inc. v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 2002