Legal Opinion

McCarson v. Bullock

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1934No. 9985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

The McCarson appellants and appellees jointly owned the 80 acres of potential sulphur land here involved; on March 17, 1928, there were among them three contractual instruments executed to the appellant sulphur company, which are fully described in the trial court’s findings herein; upon these three instruments — together with an additional one of August 6, 1930, executed by Booth McCar-son alone to the sulphur company and affecting the same property — this suit was based, wherein the appellee McCarson sought of and obtained judgment therefor against all the appellants…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Briscoe v. BronaughTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Faville v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Clark v. HaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hooser v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. CVN Group, Inc. v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. CVN Group, Inc. v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API