Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. Spring Charter Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 11, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01479Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 GERARDO HERNANDEZ, Case No. 19-cv-01479-TSH 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 10 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES 11 SPRING CHARTER INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 23 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Having settled his disability access claims, Plaintiff Gerardo Hernandez now moves for 16 attorney’s fees and costs. ECF No. 23. Defendants Spring Charter, Inc. and Satnam LLC filed an 17 Opposition (ECF No. 25) and Hernandez filed a Reply (ECF No. 29). The Court finds this matter 18 suitable for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.