Legal Opinion

McKissick v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 1, 1983No. 82-64PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The legal question presented here is one of first impression in the state insofar as we can determine, and that question is whether a "corporate veil" can be pierced in order to trigger an exclusion of coverage in an automobile liability insurance policy.

This question arises out of a declaratory judgment action in which the trial court found the policy exclusion applied; therefore, the court found that the carrier was relieved of any duty or obligation to provide a legal defense for the insured or pay any judgment rendered against its insured. The controversy originated out of an automobile…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Marriott Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. ALORNA COAT CORP., INC. v. BehrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Read News Agency, Inc. v. MomanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  5. C. E. Development Company v. KitchensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Local Union 2134, United Mine Workers of America, Etc., Plaintiff v. Powhatan Fuel, Inc., Etc., Leroy Osborne, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Pritchett v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. John E. Washburn, Director of Insurance for the State of Illinois v. Gene Rabun, D/B/A Rabun's Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Sullivan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Liggans R v. Center v. John Deere Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API