Legal Opinion

Ceballos v. Munson Steamship Line

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 20, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the Munson Steamship Line, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk.of the county of Kings on_the 29th day of November, 1904, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 22d day of November, 1904, denying the defendant’s' motion for' a new trial made upon the minutes. ' .

1Opinion of the Court

Hirschberg, P. J.:

The important questions of law which are presented by this appeal were disposed óf on a former appeal. (See Ceballos v. Munson Steamship Line, 93 App. Div. 593.) It was then held that the contract sued upon was not void for uncertainty or so absurd or unreasonable as to be unenforcible, and also that it was not necessarily in violation of the Federal Anti-Trust Law (26 U. S. Stat. at Large, 209, chap. 647). The verdict then'rendered in the plain tiffs’ favor" was found to.be against the weight of evidence, but the judgment of nonsuit which "folio wed the rendition of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Porter v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Rosenstein v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Perkins v. . HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Ceballos v. Munson Steamship LineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Iaquinto v. BauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lambden v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. Lambden v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API