Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Florens

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 14, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Fulton County ; the Hon. J. C. Bagby, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtWall, J.

The appellee recovered a judgment against the appellant for §110 for injuries inflicted upon his team in a collision with an engine running upon the railroad of appellant.

The plaintiff was engaged in hauling coal in wagons and had occasion to cross the railroad at a point where, by reason of the up grade of the wagon road, it was necessary to doub'o teams. He had thus taken one wagon over the crossing and while going over with the second, the train came along and collided with the team, killing two mules, and doing some damage to the wagon and harness. It appears that by reason of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Ry. Co. v. NeikirkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1884
  2. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. NeikirkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Butler v. Illinois Traction, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API