Legal Opinion

In re Wheatley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 10, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent was suspended from practice by this Court for a period of two years, effective September 25, 2002 (Matter of Wheatley, 304 AD2d 1039 [2003]). He now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose reinstatement but proposes conditions on respondent’s practice of law following reinstatement. Respondent seeks unconditional reinstatement.

We conclude that respondent has substantially complied with *772the provisions of the order which suspended him from practice and with the provisions of this Court’s rule governing the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WheatleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of KrounerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API