Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Haydon v. Curry

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1865PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Concurrence

Opinion by

Beatty, J., Bbosnan, J.,

concurring.

This is an information in the nature of a quo warrcmto instituted against the defendant, requiring him to show cause why he exercises the franchise of collecting tolls on a road leading from Carson City to Empire. He justifies and claims the right to collect tolls under the provisions of an Act passed by the Territorial Legislature of Nevada on the 9th day of February, 1864.

The first section of that Act grants the right to A. Curry and his associates to construct a macadamized road from Carson City to Empire. The second section is in these words:

“…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  2. Viernow v. City of CarthageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Buckley v. CurryNevada Supreme Court · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API