Legal Opinion

Hirahara v. Tanaka

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1998No. 20429PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAKAYAMA, Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellants Gayle Hirahara, et al. [collectively Hiraharas], appeal from an adverse judgment after jury trial in their medical malpractice action. The sole issue raised by the Hiraharas is whether the trial court erred by instructing the jury that a treating physician is not necessarily negligent for “errors in judgment.” The Hawai'i appellate courts have not previously addressed this issue. We perceive a clear modern trend disfavoring this language as confusing and misleading. Because cogent reasons support disallowing this language, we hold that the trial court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Briones v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Craft v. PeeblesHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Day v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. Passarello v. GrumbineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Papke v. HarbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Nelson v. University of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. MahoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API