Legal Opinion

Niven v. Munn

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1816PublishedCited by 9 opinions

THIS was a motion in arrest of judgment in an • action of sender, in which a verdict was given for the plaintiff. ' The declaration- contained two-counts- y the first count stated that the defendant, in a certain discourse which he had of and concerning, the trial- of a certain cause between David Mmn and John Wilson, then lately had, before Samuel Barnard, Ésq. a justice of the peace, in and for the County of Sullivan, and of- and, concerning the testimony of the plaintiff,…

Read the full summary

THIS was a motion in arrest of judgment in an • action of sender, in which a verdict was given for the plaintiff. ' The declaration- contained two-counts- y the first count stated that the defendant, in a certain discourse which he had of and concerning, the trial- of a certain cause between David Mmn and John Wilson, then lately had, before Samuel Barnard, Ésq. a justice of the peace, in and for the County of Sullivan, and of- and, concerning the testimony of the plaintiff, who ivas sworn * ^ * •, t 1 ^ as a witness, by the said Samuel Barnard, (he being a justice as - aforesaid,, and having…

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, Ch. J.

It has not been ,the practice, in this court, to produce the whóle record, bütthedeclárationonly,adding that a yerdic't has been found for the party.

Platt,' J.?

delivered the opinion of the court.

*49This is a motion in arrest of judgment, after verdict .for thé plaintiff, In an action of slander.

I think both counts in the declaration are good.

To say of another, that “he has sworn falsely,’? or that “he has sworn to a lie,” is not actionable,.without a colloquium of its being in a cause pending. (Hopkins v. Bedle; 1 Caines, 347. Stafford v. Green, 1 Johns. Rep. 505.)

Samuel Barnard,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gove v. BlethenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  2. Coons v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Stanley v. BritTennessee Supreme Court · 1827
  4. Stanley v. BritTennessee Supreme Court · 1827
  5. Stanley v. BritTennessee Supreme Court · 1827

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API