Lee v. State

The indictment under which the appellant was tried *673and convicted was in the following words and figures: “1. The grand jury of said county charge that before the finding of this indictment that David Lee, with intent to injure or defraud, did falsely make or forge an instrument in writing in words and figures substantially as follows: ‘May 19th. Mr. Savish let Dave Lee have the amount of $2. H. S. Minous.’

“2. And the grand jury of said county further "charges, that before the finding of this indictment Dave Lee, Avith intent to injure or defraud, did falsely make or forge an instrument in…