Coble v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Commissioner.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for murder. Punishment was assessed by the jury at life.
At the outset appellant claims his retained counsel in the trial court was ineffective and as a result of his incompetence he was denied due process under the Fourteenth Amendment and the right to effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment.
In Williams v. Beto, 354 F.2d 698 (5th Cir. 1965) it was stated, “as no two men can be exactly alike in the practice of the profession, it is basically unreasonable to judge an attorney by what another would have done, or says…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thomas Lorenzo Williams v. Dr. George Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Satillan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Witt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Broussard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
3Cited by58 opinions
- Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Miniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Ex Parte McFarlandCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Benoit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.