People v. Dyess
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Linn
In these three consolidated appeals the minor-respondents Dyess, Murff and Strickland were alleged to be under 17 years of age at the time of the commission of their respective offenses, but no proof of age was produced at the respective hearings. They were found to be delinquent, and each was committed to the Department of Corrections.
The common issue for. review is whether the juvenile court had jurisdiction to make a finding of delinquency when the State presented no proof of age. Further, in the case of respondent Michael Strickland it is argued that the State failed to prove him guilty…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- The PEOPLE v. JilesIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Wistrand v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Pekelder v. Edgewater Automotive Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re GreeneIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- People v. D. L. B.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- People v. CaffeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- People v. CarrollAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.