State v. Doyle

The conviction should be reversed. The underlying facts and circumstances are not in dispute and are correctly portrayed in the Chief Justice’s majority opinion, and, hence, there is no reason for repetition.

As noted by the majority, this Court has stated that it must be inferred from the language of subsection 1 of I.C. § 18-202 that “the legislature intended to punish any person who should commit any portion of a crime within this state to the same extent and in the same manner as though all of the acts which constitute the crime had been committed here.” State v. Sheehan, 33 Idaho 553,…