Legal Opinion

Dorland v. Steinbrecher

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 14, 1964No. Gen. 64-24PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheineman, J.

Tbe plaintiff sued the defendant in California, and defendant filed a counterclaim. The court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties; the final judgment was for the plaintiff on his complaint and that the counter plaintiff take nothing.

The present suit in Illinois was begun as a suit by plaintiff on the California judgment. The defendant again filed a counterclaim which was dismissed as barred by the prior judgment. Defendant here contends the two claims were, different, and, therefore, the present claim is not barred.

The California counterclaim alleged that Pacific Cork…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Litch v. ClinchIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bredemann v. Vaughan Mfg. CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baird & Warner, Inc. v. Addison Industrial Park, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Grisanzio v. BilkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Consol Builders & Supply Co. v. EbensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Perrin v. PIONEER NAT'L TITLE INSURANCE CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Scofield v. BehmAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API