Beekman v. Bemus
New York Supreme Court
The plaintiff’s attorney, being informed that the defendant’s attorney wished to bring error, the former promised to give the latter notice when he filed his record, so that th e latter might bring error and put in bail in season to stay proceedings.
Read the full summary
The plaintiff’s attorney, being informed that the defendant’s attorney wished to bring error, the former promised to give the latter notice when he filed his record, so that th e latter might bring error and put in bail in season to stay proceedings. The record being sent to the plaintiff’s counsel to file, if he should think it proper, previous to amending the postea, a motion for which was in plation, he filed the record; and no notice of this was given to the defendant’s attorney, till after 4 days had elapsed from the time of filing it. A fi.fa. was, in the meantime, levied A motion was…
1Opinion of the Court
Curia.
This is the common case of the 4 days expired after judgment perfected, and no order to stay proceedings. wrfi 0f exxor ig filed or bail put in. The execution *being levied, we cannot give relief. The defendant must rely on the restitution which follows the reversal of the judgment, if it shall be reversed on error.
Motion denied.(a)
Vid. Jackson v. Schawber, ante, 417.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Rathbone v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1859
- Dawley v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1872
- Stoeckel v. RussellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1881
- Stoeckel v. RussellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1881