Legal Opinion

City of Amarillo v. Henn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1956No. 6646Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellees have alleged in Paragraph Four of their motion for rehearing that this Court erred in holding that Philip Henn, Dale Schooler and Lura Lea School-er were not parties to the original proceedings before the commissioners. This was not error in the original opinion but the same has been cured by appellees’ filing a supplemental transcript in this court since the rendition of such opinion.

Appellees’ Point One in their motion for rehearing asserts that appellant is estopped to deny the jurisdiction of the County Court by reason of its having orig*736inally invoked the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Security Trust Co. v. Lipscomb CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Morris v. DrescherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Gossett v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API