Legal Opinion

Ehlin v. Piccola

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

Motion to strike. case from trial calendar pending completion of an examination before trial is denied on condition that plaintiffs submit to such examination on May 20, 1958; otherwise granted. This motion is made within the requisite 20-day period provided in subdivision (5) of the special readiness rule (of App. Div., 2d Dept.). A lapse of two months after receipt of plaintiffs ’ bill of particulars before a request is made for their examination before trial is not unreasonable, since some time is needed to investigate facts recited in such bill of particulars. This is not to say that…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Breitbart v. GerberNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Kerner v. SchulmanNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Padula v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Crespo v. PetersNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. La Porte v. BertolinoNew York Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API