Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Lewis

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1992No. S-90-1236Published

1ConcurrenceShanahan, J.

This court continues to use a strange standard for disposition of a case involving an omitted ordinance, namely:

When an ordinance charging an offense is not properly made a part of the record, an appellate court presumes the existence of a valid ordinance creating the offense charged .... In the absence from the record of the applicable municipal ordinance, an appellate court presumes that the evidence sustains the findings of the trial court and that a sentence is within the limits set out in the applicable ordinance.

*644The preceding incantation is used to pull no fewer than two “presumptions”…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wessel v. Erickson Landscaping Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Barberton v. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Lowery v. Board of County Commissioners for Ada CountyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Martinez v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API