Legal Opinion

Rose v. Russell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1946Published

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Suit by the widow of John W. Russell, deceased, for a decree declaring defendants estopped from interposing the defense that her right to recover dower was barred by the terms of the statute which prescribes that—

“no action or suit shall be brought after ten years from the death of a decedent, to recover or reduce to possession curtesy or dower by the surviving spouse of such decedent.” (Section 17-601, Vol. 2, O. C. L. A.);

for a further decree holding and adjudging that plaintiff is entitled to her dower interest in the lands belonging to the estate of said John W. Russell, deceased; that an…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Griffin v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Security Savings & Trust Co. v. Portland Flour Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Gunn v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Speer v. . JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Saddler's Adm'r v. Kennedy's Adm'rWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API