Legal Opinion
VanAlstyne v. Whalen
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided August 4, 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
This case comes before us following our allowance of the plaintiff’s application for further appellate review. We agree with the reasoning and conclusion of the Appeals Court. See VanAlstyne v. Whalen, 20 Mass. App. Ct. 239 (1985). We need add nothing. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for a new trial on damages.
So ordered.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- VanAlstyne v. WhalenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991