Legal Opinion

Consolidated Photographic Industries, Inc. v. Marks

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1952No. Civ. 18550; Civ. 18551PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

By the judgment herein Eobert Marks was “enjoined and restrained until November 1, 1952, from engaging in the photo finishing business in the County of Los Angeles.” Atlas Photographic Industries, Inc. was enjoined from employing Marks “as an officer, agent or otherwise” and from servicing specified photographic accounts in Los Angeles County. Both have appealed on the grounds that Mr. Marks’ covenant not to compete with his vendee is void, and that section 16601 of the Business and Professions Code does not protect respondents’ prior business from competition by Marks or his codefendants.

On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Judelson v. American Metal Bearing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Graca v. RodriguesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Herbert v. RiddellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  2. Consolidated Photographic Industries, Inc. v. MarksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API