Legal Opinion

Micro Signal Research, Inc. v. Otus

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 21, 2005No. 04-2563PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDIN, Chief Judge.

Nuri Otus and Maureen Cunningham, defendants in the district court, seek review of three interlocutory orders entered by the district court at the behest of the plaintiff, Micro Signal Research, Inc. (“Micro”). The purpose of the orders was to provide security to satisfy the money judgment that Micro is seeking against the defendants.

The facts, drawn from the initial filings in the district court, appear as follows. Otus and Cunningham are married to each other and work together in business ventures. One of their ventures involved a business entity called AuctioNet.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Charlesbank Equity Fund II v. Blinds to Go, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. DTC Energy Grp., Inc. v. HirschfeldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Arch InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Ginzburg v. Martínez-DávilaUnited States District Court · 2019
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. ThibeaultDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  5. Surplec, Inc. v. Maine Public Service Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API