Legal Opinion

Ganaposki's Case

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1938No. Appeal, 208PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

Appellant was for many years employed by appellee school board as a teacher. He initially taught history, civics and physical education, which included coaching in athletics. Under his present contract he was instructor in physical education under which he coached football and basketball. When relieved of his duties as football coach he refused to continue coaching basketball. Because lie refused to perform regularly assigned duties under tlie School Code, after notice and hearing he was not reelected to the teaching staff. The action of the board was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Teachers' Tenure Act CasesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Lyndall v. High School CommitteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Galloway v. Prospect Park Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Ristine v. School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1936
  5. School Expenditures for Athletics, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1936

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Dresden SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Ehret v. Kulpmont Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Johnson v. United School District Joint School BoardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Board of Education, Laurel Sp. Sch. Dist. v. ShockleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
  5. Walker v. Scranton School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API