Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Barenburg

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 19, 1946No. 2881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, District Judge.

This is a suit brought under Section 8(b) (B) and Section 8(e) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 308(b) (B), and Sec. 308(e), the plaintiff claiming that he has been denied the reinstatement and compensation to which, he is entitled under those provisions.

The first of the above mentioned provisions in the statute is as follows: “In the case of any such person [inductee] who, in order to perform such training and service, has left or leaves a position, other than a temporary position, in the employ of any employer and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kay v. General Cable CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. MacMillan v. Montecito Country Club, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
  3. Frank v. Tru-Vue, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. DoddsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  2. Featherston v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API