People v. Singh
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
The defendants in this ease were convicted of the crime of robbery, and have appealed to this court from the judgment and from an order denying them a new trial.
The alleged error of the trial court in the admission of evidence, and the refusal to give certain requested instructions, are the only points presented and discussed in support of the appeal.
The defendant Hajara Singh was called and testified as a witness in his own behalf. Upon direct examination he testified that he was at the place where the robbery occurred on the day that it was charged to have been committed. Upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. Wong LoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. BartmessOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. AtwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- State v. EldredgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.