Legal Opinion
King v. Asset Appraisal Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided October 23, 2006No. 8:05CV27PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GOSSETT, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the magistrate judge by consent of the parties on defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [100] and plaintiffs response in opposition thereto [107], This is a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The plaintiffs were employed by the defendants (together, “AAS”) as asset appraisers. They allege that, during their employment by AAS, they “routinely worked in excess of forty (40) hours per week without compensation,” in violation of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq., and the defendants knew…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Prudential Insurance Company v. Curtis R. Hinkel, Appellant/cross-Appellee, Anna Hinkel, a Minor, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walters v. American Coach Lines of Miami, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Molina v. First Line Solutions LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Walters v. American Coach Lines of Miami, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008