Legal Opinion

Halsey v. Warden

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Atchison District Court. ACTION brought by Warden & Walker, partners, against Halsey, to recover certain damages. The nature of the action, •and the facts, appear in the opinion. Trial at the June Term, 1879, of the district court, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs.

Read the full summary

Error from Atchison District Court. ACTION brought by Warden & Walker, partners, against Halsey, to recover certain damages. The nature of the action, •and the facts, appear in the opinion. Trial at the June Term, 1879, of the district court, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. Also, for the plaintiffs various special questions ■of fact were submitted to the jury, which with the answers thereto are as follows: “1. On Aug. 31, 1878, were the plaintiffs partners, doing business under the firm-name of Warden & Walker, as bankers and brokers, at Irving, Kansas? A. Yes. “ 2. As such…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HoktoN, C. J.:

In the summer and fall of 1878, Warden & Walker were bankers and brokers at Irving, Kansas, and F. P. Halsey owned an elevator in Atchison, Kansas. During the same time, M. R. Conley was engaged in the grain business at Irving, shipping to F. P. Halsey his purchases by the Central Branch Union Pacific railroad company, which issued bills of lading on his shipments. For about six months before the date of the transactions hereinafter stated, Conley had been accustomed to draw drafts upon Halsey in favor of Warden & Walker against his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Bank of Rochester v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  2. Wichita Savings Bank v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  3. Lee v. BowenU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1870

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Greenwood Grocery Co. v. Canadian County Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  2. State Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Ratzer v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Hall v. KellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API