Legal Opinion
Adams v. Clinton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 20, 2000No. Civ. 98-1665(LFO), Civ. 98-2187(LFO)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MiEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
In 1998, two complaints were filed, each alleging, inter alia, that inhabitants of the District of Columbia are being unconstitutionally deprived of their right to vote for voting representation in the House of Representatives and the Senate. Complaint, Adams v. Clinton, Civil No. 98-1665 (D.D.C.filed June 30, 1998) 1 ; Amended Complaint, Alexander v. Daley, Civil No.98-2187 (D.D.C. filed Oct. 20, 1998) 2 . As both complaints “challengfedj the constitutionality of the apportionment of congressional districts,” 28 U.S.C. § 2284(a), the cases were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chavous v. District of Columbia Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Kerr v. HickenlooperDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Gordon v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Peerless Insurance Company v. A.O. Smith CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Primoris Energy Services Corporation v. Air Products and Chemicals IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025