Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lone Star Steel Co. v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 28, 1988No. 9577Published

1DissentBleil, Justice

I disagree with the majority’s legal conclusion that we are free to apply the harmless error rule to this venue error. Therefore, I dissent.

Does the harmless error rule apply to this venue error?

Not according to the law of this state. While I agree with the majority that the harmless error rule has not previously been applied to a denial of a mandatory right to a change of venue, Í am not willing to join the majority in deciding for the first time that the harmless error rule applies to appellate review of the trial court’s failure to grant a motion for change of venue which is unopposed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Abilene v. DownsTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Sneed v. BoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Wilson v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API