Bowen v. Sheldon
Ohio Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceO’Connor, J.
{¶ 2} Because Dusten Bowen has an adequate remedy at law, I concur in the decision to dismiss his habeas corpus petition. I am compelled to write separately, however, to explain my disagreement with Justice Lanzinger’s conclusion.
*552{¶ 3} Bowen pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, a fourth-degree felony. The trial court’s August 20, 2003 sentencing entry states:
{¶ 4} “Defendant is notified that after prison release the Parole Board may impose a period of post release control and any violation of post release control conditions may result in the Adult Parole Authority of Parole…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Johnson v. Timmerman-CooperOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Moore v. GoellerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.