Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bowen v. Sheldon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 2010No. 2010-0077Published

1ConcurrenceO’Connor, J.

{¶ 2} Because Dusten Bowen has an adequate remedy at law, I concur in the decision to dismiss his habeas corpus petition. I am compelled to write separately, however, to explain my disagreement with Justice Lanzinger’s conclusion.

*552{¶ 3} Bowen pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, a fourth-degree felony. The trial court’s August 20, 2003 sentencing entry states:

{¶ 4} “Defendant is notified that after prison release the Parole Board may impose a period of post release control and any violation of post release control conditions may result in the Adult Parole Authority of Parole…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Johnson v. Timmerman-CooperOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Moore v. GoellerOhio Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API