Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 12, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Miller Circuit Court; Jacob M. Carter, Judge; W'here material evidence is discovered after the trial, which is essential to a complete defense of the action, and the failure to discover it sooner is not due to any negligence on the part of the defendant, this is a ground for setting aside the judgment and granting a new trial, after .the term in which the judgment was rendered has been adjourned.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Miller Circuit Court; Jacob M. Carter, Judge; W'here material evidence is discovered after the trial, which is essential to a complete defense of the action, and the failure to discover it sooner is not due to any negligence on the part of the defendant, this is a ground for setting aside the judgment and granting a new trial, after .the term in which the judgment was rendered has been adjourned. Kirby’s Dig. § 6220. The court heard the testimony of witnesses on the motion for new trial, and the court’s finding will not be disturbed. 53 Ark. 166; 60 Ark. 257. The trial court is…

1Opinion of the CourtBattue, J.

Daniel W. Smith brought an action against the Texas & Pacific Railway Company, before a justice of the peace of Miller County, to recover eighty-five dollars for damages caused by an alleged negligent killing of two burros by defendant. After trial and judgment in a justice’s court it was taken by appeal to the Miller Circuit Court, where a jury trial was had on the 29th of June, 1908, and judgment was rendered against the defendant in favor of the plaintiff for twenty-five dollars and costs. After the rendition of the judgment an order was made allowing the defendant until the fourth day of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robins v. FowlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1840
  2. Olmstead v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1840
  3. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garden City Feeder Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. Richardson v. SalleeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API