Legal Opinion

United States v. Calabrese

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 4, 2007No. 02 CR 1050PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES B. ZAGEL, District Judge.

On September 26, 2007, Proposed Inter-venor Chicago Tribune Company (“Tribune” or “Intervenor”) moved — on an emergency basis — to intervene 1 and for immediate access to the jurors’ names upon the return of a verdict. That day, I held a hearing on Tribune’s motion. None of the defendants in the case took a position, but the Government opposed the motion, citing three main objections. First, the Government argued that disclosing the jurors’ names could endanger their physical safety. Second, the Government asserted that to release the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. Bahman Mansoori, Mark Cox, Mohammad Mansoori, Kenneth Choice, and Terry YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. BlagojevichDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API