Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Bank of Chatsworth

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 22, 1918No. 9630PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Affidavit of illegality; from Murray superior court—Judge Tarver. February 12, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

The Bank of Chatsworth sued D. D. Anderson and H. H. Anderson. HI H. Anderson for himself and for D. D. Anderson acknowledged service on the petition. Judgment was obtained against both defendants, and execution was issued, and tó a levy'of this execution on certain land an affidavit of illegality by H. H. Anderson was interposed “for himself and as attorney in fact for D. D. Anderson,” as follows: “1. That .the said’Bank of Chatsworth holds deed to said property levied upon, for security of said debt. 2. That before the making of said levy-the plaintiff in execution did not make and have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hambrick v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. Hunter v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  3. Cone Export & Commission Co. v. McCallaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Georgia State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Ryals v. WidincampCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Bell v. TysonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API