Pinet v. Pinet
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCave, J.
This is a suit on a promissory note. Defendants’ answer 'is a general denial and a counterclaim. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence defendants offered an instruction directing a verdict for them, which was overruled. There was no further evidence and the court gave an instruction directing the jury to return a verdict for plaintiff on the note and on the counterclaim. Judgment was entered accordingly, and defendants appeal.
The evidence discloses that on August 11, Í936, defendants executed the note in suit, payable to Frank L. Pinet or order, and due* five years after date. The defendants…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Leavell v. BladesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Becraft v. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Odom v. LangstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- State ex rel. Hounsom v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- In re Partnership Estate of Henry Ames & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1873
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scott v. Potter Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Becker v. BuderDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1949
- Bohan v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1971