Legal Opinion
Peacock v. Humble
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided November 6, 1996No. 03-96-00479-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Relator, Lisa Peacock, seeks a writ of mandamus to correct the respondent’s ruling that her appeal of an associate judge’s report to the respondent, the referring district court, was untimely. See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 201.015 (West 1996). The respondent determined that Peacock faded to comply with a local rule requiring her to request the referring district court to review de novo the associate judge’s report no later than the third day after the associate judge gave notice to the parties of the substance of the report. At issue is what computation method a referring district court…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Few v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Kirkpatrick v. HurstTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Cohen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
4Cited by5 opinions
- Harrell v. Harrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
- Garza v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
- Garza v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
- M. J. M. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019
- in the Interest of M.P. and J.G., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009