Legal Opinion

Florea v. Shultz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 8, 1926Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff as city marshal sued for conversion on property in his custody and possession by virtue of a levy made pursuant to a warrant of attachment. It is well settled that a sheriff may maintain an action of conversion with respect to property in his possession as a result of a lawful levy. (Dickinson v. Oliver, 112 App. Div. 806; Ansonia, etc., v. Babbitt, 74 N. Y. 395.) Sections 45, 47 and 151 of the Municipal Court Code would appear to place city marshals on a parity with sheriffs in that regard. Moreover, no reason suggests itself for differentiation between a marshal and a sheriff in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ansonia Brass and Copper Co. v. . BabbittNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Dickinson v. OliverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API