Legal Opinion

Funke v. Paist Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1947No. Appeal, 98PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This case originated in a bill in equity for specific performance of an agreement to sell real estate. The bill was brought by the purchaser. On January 13, 1945, the defendants, husband and wife, entered into a written agreement to sell their home in Hatboro, Pennsylvania, to the plaintiff, who is a dentist. The plaintiff desired to use the entire first floor of the residence building as a dental office and to lease the second floor, as an apartment. The dental offices would consist of two operating rooms, ten feet by ten feet each; one waiting room and office, twelve feet by…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. McAnelly v. GravesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. King v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Jamison v. Concepts Plus, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Richardson v. SnipesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  5. Brotman v. RoelofsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API