Legal Opinion

Alderman Bros. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 12, 1925Published

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The rights and liabilities of the parties in this shipment are governed by the Federal Bills of Lading Act as interpreted and construed by the Federal tribunals, and by the terms of the bill of lading given to Mersky by defendant as accepted and applied by the Federal tribunals. Adams Express Co. *465v. Crordnger, 226 U. S. 491, 499, 33 Sup. Ct. 148; New England Fruit & Produce Co. v. Hines, 97 Conn. 225, 116 Atl. 243; Cassone v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 100 Conn. 262, 123 Atl. 280. Since the shipment was an interstate shipment, the defendant, as the initial carrier, would be liable for the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. J. F. French & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. New England Fruit & Produce Co. v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Kemper Mill & Elevator Co. v. HinesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API