Legal Opinion

McNabb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 17, 1989No. 88-02228PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellant, James 0. McNabb, raises two issues. His first issue is without merit as this court has previously held that probation can be imposed consecutively to community control. Skeens v. State, 542 So.2d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

For his second issue, the defendant contends, and the state agrees, that the trial court erred by imposing court costs without adequate notice or an opportunity to object as required by Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989) and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the court costs without prejudice to *314the state seeking to have them…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. Skeens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API