Legal Opinion
Harris v. United States
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided December 4, 1933No. 893PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAVAN AH, District Judge.
The plaintiff, as guardian of Thomas G. Harris, an insane person, brings this action on a yearly renewable war risk term insurance policy in the sum of $10,000 for total and permanent disability benefits.
The complaint was filed June 23, 1933, and alleges, among other things, that the disability of Thomas G. Harris is manic depressive psychosis and insanity, and general weakness and nervousness, incurred during the time of his military service, and that he has been insane at all times since his discharge from the Army, and while the policy was in force.
The government…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Struthers Wells Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ettor v. City of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Mara v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shambegian v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1936
- Jensen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1937
- Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935