Huffstutler Howell v. McKenzie
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
In the year 1910 appellee rented a part of the M. L. Hallenbeck farm in Milam county, consisting of 110 acres of land in cultivation and about 135 acres in pasture; the remainder of said farm being rented to ■other persons. During the fall of said year appellee, without the consent of Hallenbeck, made a contract with Huffstutler & Howell, whereby, in consideration of $100, he agreed to permit them to place in said pasture and a part of said cultivated land so rented by him about 300 head of cattle to remain not longer than 30 days, agreeing to extend a certain fence between his land and that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore & Rollow v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Montecon v. FauresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
- Wildey Lodge No. 21, I. O. O. F. v. City of ParisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Dayton v. NellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Betts v. DickSuperior Court of Delaware · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tenet Health Systems Hospitals Dallas, Inc. v. North Texas Hospital Physicians Group, P.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Ewing v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Gordon Kleyle v. Myrna DeograciasCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016