Legal Opinion

Huffstutler Howell v. McKenzie

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 14, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

In the year 1910 appellee rented a part of the M. L. Hallenbeck farm in Milam county, consisting of 110 acres of land in cultivation and about 135 acres in pasture; the remainder of said farm being rented to ■other persons. During the fall of said year appellee, without the consent of Hallenbeck, made a contract with Huffstutler & Howell, whereby, in consideration of $100, he agreed to permit them to place in said pasture and a part of said cultivated land so rented by him about 300 head of cattle to remain not longer than 30 days, agreeing to extend a certain fence between his land and that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore & Rollow v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  2. Montecon v. FauresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  3. Wildey Lodge No. 21, I. O. O. F. v. City of ParisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Dayton v. NellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. Betts v. DickSuperior Court of Delaware · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tenet Health Systems Hospitals Dallas, Inc. v. North Texas Hospital Physicians Group, P.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  2. Ewing v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Gordon Kleyle v. Myrna DeograciasCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API