Legal Opinion

Reed v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from DicMnson District Court. At the October Term, 1883, of the district court, plaintiff Cooper, as administrator of the estate of Enoch Vandenburg, deceased, recovered against defendant Reed a judgment for $54.75, which he brings here. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

An action was commenced before a justice of the peace in the name of John J. Cooper, to recover of plaintiff in error, defendant below, the value of a grain drill. The defendant below appealed the case to the district court. After all the evidence was submitted, the court, over the objection and exception of defendant below, permitted the plaintiff below, upon the payment of all the costs, to amend his bill of particulars to conform to the evidence, by adding, after the words “John J. Cooper,” in the title of the cause, “administrator of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunt v. LoucksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. City of Atchison v. TwineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  3. Gordon v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cooley v. GilliamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Cantrell v. Molz-Frick Implement Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Cantrell v. Molz-Frick Implement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Young v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API