Legal Opinion

Boucheron v. Tilley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 2, 1982No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s action against defendant physician is based on malpractice and lack of informed consent in connection with the prescription of a drug known as butazolidin, from which plaintiff allegedly developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome. From a dismissal of his complaint after a jury verdict of no cause for action, plaintiff appeals, seeking a reversal and a new trial because of asserted errors in evidentiary rulings. We find no error in the court’s exclusion from evidence of gratuitous opinions by physicians contained in the hospital…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & SpadacciniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cummings v. FondakAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1983
  2. Boucheron v. TilleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API