Legal Opinion

Hollander v. Rosen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 14, 1989No. 89-1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPE, Judge.

The principal question presented by this appeal is whether the statutory penalty for a wrongful refusal to allow a shareholder to inspect corporate books and records may be imposed on a foreign corporation which was required to apply for authority to transact business in this state, but failed to do so. We answer in the affirmative.

Appellant Sam Hollander filed a complaint alleging that he is a minority shareholder in a Georgia corporation, Due West Associates, Inc. He alleged that defendants Clifford and Norman Rosen are the controlling shareholders; that Due West is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Padovano v. WotitzkyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Morley v. SliderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Synchron, Inc. v. KoganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Gault v. ThacherDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2018
  3. de Saad v. Banco Industrial De Venezuela, C.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API