Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kannarr v. Hardy

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1978No. 13365Published

1DissentCameron, Chief Justice

Just as doubt concerning the validity of signatures on a primary nomination petition should be resolved in favor of the candidate, Blaine v. McSpadden, 111 Ariz. 147, 526 P.2d 390 (1974), statutes limiting the rights of a new political party to a place on the ballot should be construed in favor of ballot representation. I agree with the Arkansas Supreme Court:

“The right to become a candidate for public office is, under our form of government, a fundamental right which should not be in any manner curtailed without good cause; and any law or party rule, by which this inherent right of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Blaine v. McSpaddenArizona Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API