Story v. Quarterback Sports Federation, Inc.

ORDER DETERMINING PRIORITY OF DISCOVERY

NEVILLE, District Judge.

The above case came before the court on March 12, 1969, at Minneapolis, Minnesota, on defendants’ motion to stay the plaintiff’s taking of the duly noticed depositions of the various defendants. Defendants claim a priority so as to be permitted first to take plaintiff’s deposition. There is no dispute over the propriety of the taking of any of the depositions, merely over priority.

Defendants admit that plaintiff has duly noticed the taking of their depositions as required by Rule 30(a) of the Fed.R.Civ.Proc. and that defendants’…