Legal Opinion

Griswold v. Hazels

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1901No. 10,315PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court for Pawnee county. Tried below before Stull, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Kirkpatrick, 0.

This is an action brought by plaintiffs in error in the district court for Pawnee county against defendants in error upon a supersedeas bond given on May 14, 1894, to *889supersede a judgment entered by the district court for that county canceling a deed of conveyance made by plaintiffs in error to George Hazels on January 16, 1893, and quieting title to the premises in plaintiffs in that action. Plaintiffs in error pleaded the recovery of a judgment in the district court for Pawnee county, canceling the deed mentioned and quieting the title to the premises; that defendants in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shreffler v. NadelhofferIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Fisse v. EinsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Michie v. EllairMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lyngholm v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Tidewater Coal Exchange, Inc. v. American Surety Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API