Legal Opinion

Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. Cyr

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 13, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, C. J.

This is an action on a negotiable promissory note by the Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation, an indorsee and holder in due course, against the makers. The defense is that through fraud on the part of the payee the defendants executed the note without negligence on their part. The jury found for the defendants. The case is before us on appeal from denial of a motion for judgment for the plaintiff notwithstanding the verdict.

Apart from the alleged fraud, the plaintiff is plainly a holder in due course under the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Act, which reads:

“Sec. 52. What constitutes holder…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. CurtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
  2. Abbott v. RoseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873
  3. Farrell v. LovettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878
  4. Biddeford National Bank v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
  5. Branz v. StanleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Factors & Note Buyers, Inc. v. Green Lane, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API