Legal Opinion

People v. Khan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 2012PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jones, J.

In defendant’s appeal arising from his convictions for health care fraud in the fourth degree and grand larceny in the third degree, the primary issue we address is the legal sufficiency of the evidence. This is the Court’s first opportunity to determine the nature of proof required for a conviction under the recently enacted health care fraud statute (Penal Law art 177 et seq.).* We conclude that defendant’s convictions are supported by legally sufficient evidence. Additionally, we resolve defendant’s question regarding his statutory right to a speedy trial in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. SantiNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. People v. GuarnieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. AlcindorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. People v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API