Mason v. Routzahn
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
WE STENTIAYER, District Judge,
This is an action to recover back taxes paid under protest on dividends received on stock held in the B. F. Goodrich Company. Parties have waived in writing jury trial. All jurisdictional requirements have been satisfied. The evidence consists exclusively of an agreed statement of facts in writing, which is approved and adopted as my findings of fact.
Plaintiff owned and held both common and preferred stock during the year's 1916 and 1917. On October 25,1916, the corporation declared on its common stock a dividend of $1 per share, payable February 15, 1917, and on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Douglas v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Plant v. WalshDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1922
- United States v. GuinzburgCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bryan v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Phillips v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1926
- Kales v. WoodworthDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927